![]() These policies have provided inspiration for asylum practices in some postcolonial states-Israel is reported to have reached an agreement with Uganda and Rwanda to deport asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea, although these are not public. Such policies were designed to prevent the arrival of refugees in the UK. In many cases, such forced dispersal concerned those who had been recognised as refugees who were interned and subsequently moved elsewhere in the Empire. We draw attention to these longer histories before investigating more recent cases of the dispersal of refugees within the British Empire in the twentieth century. Colonial policies of forcible removal, relocation, displacement, and dispersal around the Empire are well established. Yet a much clearer precedent involving the forcible movement of people to countries where they have no personal or legal connection existed for many years in the British Empire. There are certainly some international parallels, such as Australia’s ‘Pacific Solution’ of ‘offshoring’ asylum, which is often cited as an inspiration. These proposals differ from official practices of deportation as they have developed in liberal democracies since the 1970s. Offshoring refugees: colonial echoes of the UK-Rwanda Migration and Economic Development Partnershipīritish proposals to forcibly deport asylum seekers to Rwanda have raised fierce opposition from across the political spectrum in the UK and internationally.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |